Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernesto van Peborgh (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:23, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ernesto van Peborgh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was about to prod it for failing NBIO/GNG, but it was already AfD by User:DGG for similar reasons, but prior nominations attracted no participants. Let's try this again; my BEFORE failed to show anything outside few mentions in passing, and GScholar does not suggest the subject passes NPROF. PS. Related AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sustainability 2.0 - neologism attributed to him._{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:08, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:08, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:08, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:08, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A handful of cites on GS but not enough to pass WP:Prof. Is there anything else? Xxanthippe (talk) 04:23, 2 July 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Delete as before. Thanks, Piotrus, for remembering to bring this up again. DGG ( talk ) 06:04, 2 July 2020 (UTC) DGG ( talk ) 10:03, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable per all of the above. Also note it looks like some COI editing has been going on here, if you look at the history of this page, all major contributors are SPAs and only involved in this, or his neologism Sustainability 2.0. Feels like this is just use of Wikipedia for PR. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 12:01, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable as a businessman nor as an engineer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:06, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete insufficient evidence of notability -Kj cheetham (talk) 12:39, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.